The Parable Of The Sadhu Short Story - 879 Words

Integrity in â€Å"The Parable of the Sadhu† Integrity is defined as the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles. People always associated integrity with only honesty; however, honesty is not equal to integrity. One can be honest and yet still lacking in integrity. In â€Å"The Insufficiency of Honesty,† Stephen L. Carter claims that integrity requires three steps: discerning what is right and what is wrong; acting on what you have discerned, even at personal cost; and saying openly that you are acting on your understanding of right and wrong. On the other hand, Bowen McCoy shares a story of when he was unexpectedly intruded by an ethical dilemma during his expedition to the Himalayas, in his article, â€Å"The Parable of the Sadhu.†Ã¢â‚¬ ¦show more content†¦McCoy and all the people he encountered ultimately failed the second requirement. They were all aware that the Sadhu needed help and it is dangerous to leave him alone; nonetheless, the Sadhu was left alone as none of them are willing to be responsible as it would be inconvenient for them. Last but not least, the third step for integrity is saying openly that you are acting on your understanding of right and wrong. This step reminds people that a person of integrity can be trusted. McCoy said to Stephen that he had done enough on his part for the Sadhu. Even though he openly said it, he failed to understand the right and wrong. Carter stated that moral responsibilities cannot be avoided by simply stating the intention to ignore them. People often use honesty as their excuse to avoid obligations. Besides that, Stephen also asked McCoy if their behavior would have changed if the Sadhu had been someone they are familiar with. In my opinion, McCoy would act totally different if that was the case as people tend to be better with someone familiar or from the same group. Nobody was willing to provide more help to the Sadhu as he looked like he would not benefit them; therefore, they left him in order to complete their expedition. As said by Stephen, McCoy was just like aShow MoreRelatedAnalyzing the Parable of the Sadhu1559 Words   |  7 Pageswhile helping the Sadhu is clearly not. Action was ethical. However the fact that McCoy feels guilty reflects that he was unable to promote his long term interest. Hence it becomes ambiguous to justify his actions. Kantian Ethics: Should abide by the following 2 principles: *Maxim should become a universal law *Never treat people simply as means to an end but always at the same time as ends in themselves In the parable, Stephen says that the hikers would have treated the Sadhu differently if heRead MoreLeadership, Trustworthiness and Ethical Stewardship Essay examples2114 Words   |  9 PagesObjectives In the Parable of the Sadhu, McCoy recognized there was a distinct difference between the individual vs. the group ethic. The analogy used in this story about a group of mountain climbers that were confronted with an ailing man showed that external personal experiences can parallel business situations when an immediate response is mandatory and failure to act is also making a decision. (Jennings, 2012, p. 7) The group that was confronted with the parable of the Sadhu problem had no purpose